杏吧视频

杏吧视频

HMA 杏吧视频 - Blog

Show All | Podcast | Blogs | Webinars | Weekly Roundup | Videos | Case Studies | Reports | News | Spotlight

Filter by topic:

Receive timely expert insights on topics you care about.

Select Topics

462 Results found.

Blog

Strategic Planning for Healthcare Organizations in a time of Disruption

Read Blog

Why healthcare strategy is needed more than ever in times of rapid change

When thinking about strategy, most organizations have a strategic plan. But with the amount of change being thrust upon the healthcare industry, no one could have predicted the current landscape even one year ago. 

The strategy function at a healthcare organization generates strategic plans, identifies growth initiatives and validates them. A core responsibility is monitoring the information and policies that inform those hypotheses. The best organizations are able to stay focused on their overall goals while keeping track of, adapting, and changing as new information surfaces.

The high pace of change related to technology, policy, and regulation, requires continual monitoring and reassessment. Not every healthcare organization has the competencies to track and manage these changes, and entities frequently come to HMA to either validate assumptions that are the basis of their plans, or to outsource components of the analysis or the implementation.

Organizations generally have a good handle on certain elements, including their own assets and competencies, the strength of relationships with their partners, and hopefully an understanding of what their customers want. But in times of rapid change, consultants can support monitoring external market factors and turbulence on the policy and regulatory front. They can assess changes on the technology side as well, including ways to integrate AI and other digital technologies to enable care delivery. Organizations see the potential for policy changes to disrupt the way they are doing business, but may need outside validation to ultimately communicate and operationalize new approaches within their business.  

For more on this, listen to this month鈥檚 podcast Ready or Not: Implementing Strategy Amid Massive Healthcare Disruption where we discuss some of our thinking on ways companies can stay ahead of the game. 

Ready to transform your organization?

If your organization is struggling to turn strategy into action, our experts are available to help you lay a clear path to positive results.  Whether you are focused on payments, healthcare delivery, government policy, behavioral health, life sciences, Medicare, Medicaid, or Managed Care, our HMA experts are ready to partner with you, from initial strategy-setting through implementation.

Related resources:

Blog

Proposed Rule on the CY 2026 Medicare PFS Emphasizes Value-Based Care and Alternative Payment Models

Read Blog

This week, our first In Focus reviews the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) proposed rule for the calendar year (CY) 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS), released on July 14, 2025. The proposal echoes many of the administration鈥檚 priorities and would substantially change how physicians are paid for their 杏吧视频, focusing on value-based payment strategies, efficiency adjustments, conversion factors, technology coding, and MSSP eligibility.

This In Focus is the second in our series covering recent Medicare-related announcements. [Last week, we discussed CMS Innovation Center updates.]

Emphasis on Value-Based, Hospital-Based Care

The  reflects the administration鈥檚 prioritization of value-based care, chronic care management, new payment strategies for evolving models of care delivery, and support for technology-based 杏吧视频. Provisions in the proposed rule also are intended to reduce costs through reimbursement rate changes, better access to behavioral health 杏吧视频, and facilitated advanced primary care management (APCM).

The proposal recognizes the additional complexity of providing primary care in the home and other residential environments by proposing to allow billing of an add-on code to trigger additional payment for home-based visits. CMS also proposes to delete separate coding and payment for social determinants of health (SDOH) risk assessments (established in 2024) and will begin referring to SDOH as 鈥渦pstream driver(s).鈥

Emphasis on Efficiency and Lower Practice Expenses

Proposed changes include an 鈥渆fficiency adjustment,鈥 which would reduce the physician work relative value unit (RVU) based on the assumption that as clinicians gain experience and technology advances, procedures become more efficient. CMS also proposes to rebalance clinician reimbursement for expenses to recognize that hospital-based physicians incur fewer costs than physicians in private or group practices and that the number of physicians practicing in hospitals has increased significantly, leaving far fewer physicians in freestanding offices. As a result, CMS estimates specialists who furnish care in hospital settings will experience double-digit cuts in reimbursement on average, whereas those practicing in freestanding (non-facility) settings will generally receive increases, though the impact on any individual clinician or practice will depend on the mix of 杏吧视频 provided.

CMS continues to evaluate potential payment reform for global surgical packages and is studying the real-world division of work between surgeons and providers of postoperative care, as CMS findings suggest only a fraction of post-discharge visits included in valuation are furnished.

Positive PFS Conversion Factor Update

All providers/suppliers paid for 杏吧视频 under the PFS will benefit from positive statutory updates to the conversion factor, with slightly higher increases going to clinicians who meet certain eligibility requirements for participating in an Advanced Alternative Payment Model (APM) under the Quality Payment Program (QPP). Specifically, two conversion factors would be available in CY 2026. Under the proposed rule, 杏吧视频 furnished by providers who participate in qualifying Advanced APMs would be paid based on a conversion factor of $33.5875, representing a 3.84 percent increase (or $1.2410) from the 2025 amount of $32.3465. Services furnished by providers who do not participate in a qualifying AAPM are proposed to be paid based on a conversion factor of $33.4209, representing an increase of 3.32 percent (or $1.0744) from CY 2025.

Both conversion factors reflect the 2.50 percent overall update required by statute, a 0.55 percent budget neutrality adjustment to account for RVU changes, and an updated factor of 0.75 percent for qualified APMs or 0.25 percent for non-qualifying APMs. CY 2026 is the final year in which eligible clinicians can receive an additional APM incentive. Qualifying clinicians will get a one-time payment of 1.88 percent of their paid claims for covered professional 杏吧视频 based on performance from two years earlier.

Evolving Coding and Payment for Technology-Based Services

CMS continues to expand coding and payment for technology-based 杏吧视频, including a proposal for the use of digital mental health treatment (DMHT) devices used in conjunction with an ongoing treatment plan of care for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The agency recognizes that behavioral health conditions are common chronic diseases and that the field of digital therapeutics is evolving.

CMS requests comments on the use of devices for treating symptoms of gastrointestinal conditions, sleep disturbance for psychiatric conditions, and symptoms of fibromyalgia, as well as to aid in the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. The agency also seeks input on a broader set of digital tools that could be used to encourage a healthy lifestyle. Through comment requests, CMS suggests that it might consider payment for digital tools that do not require Food and Drug Administration clearance in future years.

While CMS allows PFS payment of Software as a Service (SaaS) and artificial intelligence (AI) applications in certain circumstances, it also solicits comments on how to establish stable and consistent reimbursement for these technologies and asks how they can be used in the management of chronic diseases and primary care 杏吧视频.

Telehealth-Related Flexibilities

CMS proposes to streamline the process for adding codes to the telehealth list and making other adjustments to supervision and frequency of billing requirements for codes on the list.

Medicare Diabetes Prevention Program

CMS proposes several changes to the Medicare Diabetes Prevention Program (MDPP), which was expanded in 2018 under the CMS Innovation Center authority to increase beneficiary participation and to align with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention program standards. These proposed changes include the addition and codification of more virtual flexibilities including asynchronous delivery of 杏吧视频, technical changes to the collection of data, and payment changes to reflect these new requirements.

Medicare Shared Savings Program

The proposed rule comprises several provisions to modify eligibility requirements for certain tracks of the program, revisions to the quality performance standards and reporting requirements, and other changes to improve the operations of the program. The Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) now has more than 477 ACO participants, furnishing care to 11.2 million Medicare beneficiaries.

Drugs and Biological Products Incident-to Physician Services

The proposed rule addresses reimbursement for drugs paid incident-to a physician鈥檚 service, including policies related to the Inflation Reduction Act provisions, continued implementation of discarded units refund requirements, changes and clarifications to Average Sales Price (ASP) reporting, and payment for procurement of tissue required to manufacture cell-based gene therapies.

Citing a nearly 40-fold increase in spending for skin substitute products from 2019 to 2024, CMS proposes major changes for reimbursement of skin substitutes that would pay for most of these products as supplies incident-to physician 杏吧视频, rather than as Part B drugs. CMS estimates that these modifications would result in significant savings. If finalized, these proposals will take effect at the same time as CMS launches a new model in six geographic areas to test clinical review for certain 杏吧视频, including skin substitutes, in fee-for-service Medicare to achieve the WISeR (Waste and Inappropriate Service Reduction) Model.

Requests for Information

CMS included multiple requests for information in the CY 2026 proposed rule. The agency seeks stakeholder feedback on how the fee schedule can be used to better account for indirect practice expenses (PEs) costs in facility settings, integration of preventive 杏吧视频 into APCM bundles, and use of motivational interviewing and health coaching to improve chronic disease prevention and management.

On the QPP, CMS seeks input on advancing digital quality measurement, refining MIPS (Merit-Based Incentive Payment System) Value Pathways (MVPs) through core elements, procedural code alignment, and well-being and nutrition measures. The agency also requests comments on improving public health and prescription drug monitoring reporting and strengthening data quality and performance thresholds across Medicare鈥檚 quality programs.

Contact an HMA Medicare Expert Today

杏吧视频, Inc. (HMA), policy and rate setting experts are analyzing the details and impacts in the proposed rule and will provide additional updates to key Medicare policies as they become available. Our team can help support stakeholder development of policy and data-oriented comments on this rule, due September 12, 2025, and on any other Medicare policy topic of interest. Contact聽our experts below聽to discuss your priorities and approach.

Blog

CY 2026 Medicare Hospital OPPS Proposed Rule Encourages Site of Service Shifts and Data Collection for Use in Rate Setting

Read Blog

Our second In Focus reviews the policy changes in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for the calendar year (CY) 2026 Medicare Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) and Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC) Payment System Proposed Rule (). This OPPS proposed rule, released January 15, 2025, includes several important policy revisions that will alter hospital margins and change administrative procedures beginning as soon as January 1, 2026.

Key Provisions in the CY 2026 Hospital OPPS and ASC Proposed Rule

For CY 2026, CMS proposes to make critical modifications to several hospital outpatient and ASC payment policies, which hospitals and other stakeholders will need to quickly adopt. We highlight and interpret the following seven proposed policies that may be among the most impactful for Medicare beneficiaries, hospitals and health systems, payers, and manufacturers:

  1. Proposed updates for OPPS and ASC payment rates are consistent with proposed inpatient rates.
  2. The phased elimination of the inpatient-only (IPO) list will cause 杏吧视频 to shift to the outpatient setting.
  3. Expansion of the ASC covered procedures list will cause 杏吧视频 to shift from the outpatient to ASC setting.
  4. Site-neutral payment to drug administration 杏吧视频 will be expanded to all off-campus provider-based departments.
  5. Medicare Advantage data will be used to set weights for inpatient Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Groups (MS-DRGs).
  6. 340B payment recovery will intensify to recover funds more quickly.
  7. A new survey will be conducted to gather data on the amount hospitals pay for drugs used in the hospital outpatient department.

Stakeholder comments on the OPPS and ASC Proposed Rule are due to CMS by September 13, 2025.

What the Seven Provisions Mean

1. The proposed payment update for OPPS and ASC rates is consistent with proposed inpatient rates.

Proposed Rule: Overall CMS鈥檚 CY 2026 Medicare OPPS and ASC Proposed Rule will increase 2025 payments to acute care hospitals by 2.4 percent in 2026, amounting to an estimated $4 billion increase in payments. This update is based on a hospital market basket increase of 3.2 percent and a 0.8 percent reduction for total factor productivity.

HMA Analysis: CMS鈥檚 2.4 percent increase results from the estimated rate of increase in the cost of a standard basket of hospital goods, the hospital market basket. CMS estimates that total payments to OPPS and ASC providers (including beneficiary cost sharing and estimated changes in enrollment, utilization, and case mix) for CY 2026 will increase by roughly $8.1 billion and $480 million, respectively, from CY 2025 payment levels. The proposed outpatient and ASC rates are consistent with the proposed inpatient payment update for 2026.

2. Phased elimination of the IPO list to cause movement of cases from inpatient to outpatient setting.

Proposed Rule: CMS has long maintained a list of procedures and 杏吧视频 that must be provided on an inpatient basis and are excluded from the OPPS. In the CY 2021 final rule, CMS finalized a proposal to eliminate the IPO list over three years, beginning with nearly 300 procedures. CMS noted various changes in technology and chose to defer to the clinical judgment of physicians which procedures can be safely performed in the hospital outpatient department based on the circumstances of individual patients. When the Biden Administration entered office in 2022, CMS halted the process of eliminating the inpatient-only list and reinstituted five criteria it had previously used to determine whether a procedure should be removed from the IPO list.

Under the Trump Administration, CMS now proposes to again eliminate the IPO list over a three- year period. For 2026, CMS proposes to eliminate 285 mostly musculoskeletal 杏吧视频 from the IPO list. Across the next two rulemaking cycles CMS will eliminate the remaining 杏吧视频 from the IPO list and the agency is requesting stakeholder input regarding which 杏吧视频 should be eliminated from the IPO list in CY 2027.

HMA Analysis: If finalized, the policy to eliminate the IPO list is likely to spur a migration of many cases from the inpatient setting to the hospital outpatient setting. Many of these cases are likely to be surgical short-stay cases. Given that the proposed policy would defer largely to clinical judgment to determine which procedures are performed in the outpatient setting, we anticipate a degree of variability by hospital in how this policy plays out. We anticipate hospital revenues will decline because of this policy, as certain inpatient payment adjustments are inapplicable to the outpatient setting. We do not anticipate a cost sharing impact on patients due to policies that protect them from higher outpatient cost sharing. Because the Medicare IPO list has served as a foundation for many site of service coverage decisions, we anticipate payers will respond to this policy by encouraging more rapid migration of cases to the outpatient setting, which is likely to result in lower Medicare spending.

3. Expansion of the ASC covered procedures list will cause 杏吧视频 to shift from the outpatient to ASC setting.

Proposed Rule: CMS proposes to add 547 杏吧视频 to the ASC covered procedures list.

HMA Analysis: CMS鈥檚 proposal to add 547 杏吧视频 to the ASC CPL enables greater fluidity of site of service for providers in deciding where to conduct procedures. Among these 547 杏吧视频 are 276 musculoskeletal 杏吧视频 that are also proposed for removal from the OPPS IPO list. While state regulations concerning which procedures can be conducted in ASCs may affect which cases are eventually conducted in the ASC setting, CMS鈥檚 plan to expand the ASC CPL may enable some musculoskeletal 杏吧视频 to move directly from the inpatient setting to the ASC setting in 2026. We anticipate that the expansion of the ASC CPL may result in lower revenues for hospitals as cases move from the inpatient or outpatient setting to the ASC. This shift may also result in lower Medicare spending.

4. Expansion of the site-neutral policy to drug administration 杏吧视频 furnished in all outpatient provider-based departments.

Proposed Rule: Under the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, CMS is required to implement site-neutral payments for off-campus provider-based departments (PBDs). This legislation exempted PBDs (also known as 鈥渆xcepted PBDs鈥) established as of the date of enactment. The policy has generally paid affected 杏吧视频 at 40 percent of the OPPS rate. The agency presents the results of its own analyses, showing growth in drug administration 杏吧视频 in the OPPS even as the number of fee-for-service beneficiaries has decreased. CMS concludes that 鈥渢he differential in our payment rates has created a payment incentive that had led to unnecessary growth for the 杏吧视频 in the drug administration鈥 payment rates.

CMS proposes to apply the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) payment adjustment to drug administration payments for 杏吧视频 performed at excepted off-campus PBDs, which will be the same reimbursement rates available to non-excepted PBDs. This adjustment is proposed to be made in a non-budget-neutral manner. CMS also asks for comments on whether the PFS adjuster should be applied to other 杏吧视频. CMS also issues a request for information (RFI) on the potential to expand site-neutral payments for clinic visits to include on campus clinic visit 杏吧视频 and a second RFI seeking information on the possibility of adjusting OPPS payments for 杏吧视频 鈥減redominantly performed鈥 in the ASC or physician鈥檚 office setting

HMA AnalysisCMS estimates this policy will yield $280 million in savings to Medicare for 2026, which will translate into commensurate revenue reductions for the hospital industry. Although CMS proposes to exempt rural sole community hospitals from this policy, other types of safety net providers may also seek an exemption.

5. The use of Medicare Advantage data to set weights for inpatient MS-DRGs.

Proposed Rule: CMS proposes to require hospitals to submit to CMS Medicare Advantage payment information through their annual hospital cost reports for later use in setting Medicare inpatient PPS payment rates. As a part of this proposal CMS will require hospitals to include in their annual cost report submissions to CMS their median negotiated payer-specific Medicare Advantage charges by individual MS-DRG. CMS proposes to begin collecting these data in the 2026 cost reporting period, and to use these data to set MS-DRG relative weights beginning in FY 2029. CMS asserts that the agency intends to make these changes to reduce its reliance on the hospital chargemaster for setting rates for inpatient 杏吧视频 and instead create a market-based approach to rate setting.

HMA Analysis: The first Trump Administration proposed a nearly identical policy in the CY 2021 rulemaking cycle. Like the IPO list history, this proposed policy was not implemented in the CY 2022 rulemaking cycle when the Biden Administration was in place. If implemented for 2026, the reporting of negotiated charge data will add administrative complexity to hospitals鈥 cost reporting processes. It is unclear whether the use of these data in the IPPS rate setting process will increase or decrease payment rates. Therefore, it is unclear how this policy might affect hospital revenue or Medicare spending.

6. Increase the pace of 340B payment recovery from hospitals to recover funds more quickly.

Proposed Rule: CMS proposes to change its policy for recovering past overpayments resulting from the budget neutrality adjustments accompanying prior cuts to reimbursement for 340B drugs. The 340B recoupment process was scheduled to begin in 2026 by reducing the hospital outpatient conversion factor by 0.5 percent annually until $7.8 billion in payments were recovered. CMS forecasted this would occur annually for 16 years; however, the CY 2026 OPPS proposed rule calls for reducing the outpatient conversion factor by 2 percent over the span of six years.

HMA AnalysisIf implemented, CMS鈥檚 proposed 340B recovery policy will result in a payment reduction to hospitals of $1.1 billion in 2026. We anticipate the scale of this impact will continue during the subsequent five years that the policy is in place. We expect that hospital opposition to this proposed change will be significant.

7. New survey to gather data on the amount hospitals pay for drugs used in the hospital outpatient department.

Proposed Rule: CMS announced its intent to conduct a new survey to gather information from hospitals about the amount they pay for drugs used in the outpatient setting. The survey of drug acquisition costs will apply to specified covered outpatient drugs (SCODs) and 鈥渄rugs and biologicals that CMS historically treats as SCODs.鈥 The survey will begin at the end of 2025 and end in early 2026. CMS has stated that it intends for these survey results to 鈥渋nform policy making鈥 beginning with the 2027 rulemaking cycle.

HMA AnalysisThe data collected through this survey effort could be used to set payment rates for Part B drugs or to inform 340B payment policy, but how exactly these data would be used is unclear. CMS noted that an adequate response rate will be necessary and asks for input on how to interpret nonresponses, such as assuming that non-responding hospitals have very low drug costs and therefore payment for drugs and biologics could be packaged with other 杏吧视频. CMS also noted that other sources of drug data could include the Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) or other benchmarks or different markups to ASP data.

HMA鈥檚 Medicare Practice Group Can Help

The 杏吧视频, Inc. (HMA), Medicare Practice Group monitors federal regulatory and legislative developments in the hospital space and assesses the impact on hospitals, life science companies, payers, and other stakeholders. Our experts interpret and model hospital payment policies and assist clients in developing CMS comment letters and long-term strategic plans. Our team replicates CMS payment methodologies and model alternative policies using the most current Medicare fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage (100 percent) claims data. We also support clients with DRG reassignment requests, New Technology Add-on Payment (NTAP) applications, and analyses of CMS Innovation Center alternative payment models.

For more information or questions about the policies described below, please contact聽our experts below.

Blog

Preparing for Ohio鈥檚 Aging Future: With Federal Uncertainty, Local Innovation Must Lead

Read Blog

Ohio faces a demographic reckoning. With 55 million Americans now over 65, including 2.2 million Ohioans, Ohio’s older adult population is expected to grow faster than the national average, while its population under 65 is projected to shrink. Nationally, by 2050, the number of individuals aged 85 and older is expected to double, creating an unprecedented demand for 杏吧视频 as this population becomes more diverse and economically vulnerable. Innovation and collaboration will be especially critical in supporting those who won’t qualify for existing programs and in simplifying access to a complex system of providers and resources.

Fortunately, Ohio also boasts remarkable aging service innovators, from National Church Residences鈥 expertise in institutional transitions back to the community, to United Church Homes鈥 expanded service coordination beyond its affordable housing communities, to the Area Agencies on Aging serving as key partners to managed care organizations for the MyCare Ohio program. Success in Ohio’s aging future will hinge on building on these kinds of examples, mastering collaboration, and creating integrated systems that serve vulnerable populations effectively, irrespective of federal funding levels.

To that end, the following questions represent critical challenges reflecting conversations happening in boardrooms, county commissioner meetings, and strategic planning sessions across Ohio and the country.

Building Age-Ready Communities: Key Questions for Local Stakeholders

1.聽How can state and counties align their aging-in-place investments with those of payers, providers, and purchasers to increase the value of existing programs and resources?

As the aging population grows rapidly, states and counties can maximize aging-in-place investments by establishing unified visions that bring together public agencies, healthcare systems, and private sector partners under shared, evidence-based strategies. This requires deliberate alignment with state and local priorities while engaging private insurers, employers, and community organizations as strategic co-investors. Ohio exemplifies this approach through its remarkable growth in 鈥36 communities have now achieved age-friendly designation, including 10 new communities since early 2023, demonstrating accelerating momentum toward the development of systematic aging-in-place infrastructure.

Ensuring accountability and tracking progress are essential in demonstrating the effectiveness of public-private investments. Tools like data dashboards help maintain initiative momentum and adapt to needs. Additionally, strategically coordinating funding from various sources, such as Medicaid, Medicare, and private insurance, can enhance resource integration. exemplifies how shared resources can improve aging-in-place outcomes while serving as a replicable blueprint for creating age-friendly communities.

2.聽How can support for older adults in rural communities be increased?聽

While urban areas grapple with capacity, rural Ohio faces a different challenge: doing more with less. Nearly one in three rural Ohioans is now 60 or older鈥攁 concentration that’s both a testament to community strength and a preview of coming pressures. These challenges include limited access to healthcare specialists, transportation systems designed for different needs, and the risk of social isolation as neighbors and family members become more dispersed. Ohioans in rural and Appalachian regions are designated as priority populations in eight of the nineteen outcomes outlined in

Additionally, local leaders across health plans, hospitals, aging 杏吧视频 organizations, and government are uniquely positioned to expand telehealth networks that bring care directly into homes, invest in the broadband and housing infrastructure that makes aging in place possible, and build homegrown training programs that keep caregivers rooted in their communities. Partnerships between Area Agencies on Aging, rural hospitals, and community organizations can create integrated care models that align multiple funding streams, including Medicare and Medicaid, as well as Older Americans Act and county resources. What is needed now is coordination to replicate or scale approaches that will be key to ensuring sustainable aging support for Ohio’s rural older adults and ensure the access required for the changes underway.

3. How can stakeholders reduce social isolation and increase access to age-friendly behavioral health 杏吧视频?

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report, 鈥溾  documents the impact of COVID-19 on social isolation and loneliness among older adults. The report recommends five strategies to promote social connectedness and reduce social isolation, including:

  • Community-based support: Using existing community infrastructure to leverage the resources of community service networks.
  • Community leadership: Partnering with communities to design and deliver 杏吧视频, forcing inclusive, action-oriented alliances to enhance social connection and solutions tailored to each unique community.
  • Digital environments: Utilizing online support groups to address loneliness and social isolation, being cognizant of cultural or generational preferences for electronic communication platforms.
  • Social infrastructure: Designing inclusive and multifaceted public infrastructure and mixed-use planning, incorporating libraries, gardens, shops, cafes to promote social connectedness.
  • Comprehensive policy initiatives: Proactive policymaking to aid in the enhancement of social connectedness through supportive programs that address older adults’ unique challenges.

In addition to . Community and state agencies need to come together to expand access to age-friendly mental health and substance use disorder 杏吧视频 and to engage older adults in preventive and supportive strategies. Healthy lifestyle programs like are offered in communities statewide through the and local . These programs offer depression screenings and approaches to managing depression, anxiety, and chronic disease.

4.聽What are new and innovative approaches to expand affordable housing to prevent homelessness, unsafe living situations, and preventable healthcare costs?

According to the the number of older Ohioans who live alone is increasing. One in eight Ohio households 鈥 or more than 613,000 鈥 houses a single adult aged 65 or over. Aging householders living alone face unique challenges when it comes to maintaining the cost and upkeep of homes, especially among those who wish to age in place. Furthermore, one in eight mortgage holders aged 55 and over (13%) is severely housing cost burdened. Nineteen percent of mortgage holders aged 65 and over and 25% of those aged 75 and over are severely mortgage burdened.

Members of the Ohio General Assembly proposed a comprehensive solution to the housing crisis, including:

  • Increase access to affordable housing for all Ohioans regardless of income by increasing the number of new units being built and helping local governments and for-profits and non-profits rehabilitate existing housing stock.
  • Provide property tax relief that promotes tax fairness for all Ohioans with targeted assistance for veterans, seniors, first-time homebuyers, and low-income and middle-income renters.
  • Update zoning laws and building inspection laws to reduce regulatory obstacles and allow for new housing developments; modernize real estate agency agreements; increase property conveyance transparency; and make changes to the eviction process.

Even for older adults who have affordable housing, most will need support at some point to age in place. The resources from the Institute for Healthcare Improvement provide a great framework for supporting older adults to age in place 鈥 the 4Ms of age-friendly organizations. These include (1) understanding what matters to older adults, (2) helping with medication issues, (3) preventing, identifying, and managing mental health conditions and dementia, and (4) ensuring mobility needs are met. 

5.聽How can the state increase older adults, caregivers and communities access to 聽聽information that is easy to understand about resources to support aging in place?

Currently, Ohio has a by zip code, partly driven by unequal access to aging resources. With older Ohioans speaking languages other than English, simply having 杏吧视频 is not enough; information must be accessible and culturally relevant.

Older adults struggle to navigate complex systems to find housing assistance, healthcare options, transportation, and caregiver supports. Many give up before getting help. shows that nationally, 21% of Area Agencies on Aging employ Community Health Workers (CHWs), with 20% more seeking to add them. These trusted community members serve as cultural bridges, providing linguistically appropriate connections to care, accompanying older adults to appointments, and offering emotional support and companionship.

Gaps exist, but there are solutions where partnerships can accelerate progress.

  • Community-Based Organizations: Expand CHW programs, host resource fairs in culturally familiar venues like faith centers and community halls, develop peer-to-peer information networks.
  • Health Plans: Fund CHW positions, create simplified resource materials, and integrate aging 杏吧视频 information into member communications.
  • Local Government: Support broadband access in underserved areas, fund transportation to resource centers, and coordinate age-friendly community planning.
  • Private Sector: Provide workplace caregiver supports and partner on innovative outreach methods.

Better access to information requires a coordinated effort. Communities are finding that reaching older adults requires innovative partnerships that meet them where they are, whether that’s at their church, community center, doctor’s office, or through a trusted neighbor who understands their language and culture.

Blog

Planning for What鈥檚 Next: Medicaid Financing Implications of H.R.1

Read Blog

As federal budget negotiations continue, proposed policy changes under H.R.1 are prompting important questions for states and the healthcare providers that rely on Medicaid funding. While the exact timing and scope of implementation remain uncertain, the structural changes being debated鈥攅specially those tied to eligibility, enrollment, and reimbursement鈥攃ould significantly reshape the Medicaid landscape in Ohio and beyond.

At HMA, we鈥檙e helping provider associations, health systems, and Medicaid plans begin modeling how these potential changes could affect state budgets and provider revenue streams over time. By leveraging Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates of projected federal Medicaid expenditures, we can develop targeted forecasts that account for major eligibility provisions鈥攕uch as community engagement requirements, redetermination policies, and limits on retroactive eligibility.

This type of modeling is already underway in several states. For example, HMA is currently working with a multi-state hospital system to estimate how community engagement rules could affect their Medicaid volumes and supplemental payment streams. We鈥檙e also partnering with state-level trade associations that represent providers heavily exposed to Medicaid鈥攕uch as community mental health agencies and FQHCs鈥攖o evaluate how future state budgets could impact base reimbursement or access to directed payments.

These forecasts are not one-size-fits-all. More in-depth analysis often requires access to rate letters and state-specific Medicaid financing mechanisms, including provider taxes and pass-through payment arrangements. But even without full data sets, we can begin to sketch reasonable budget and enrollment scenarios that help providers prepare for different possibilities.

For organizations operating in Medicaid-heavy markets like Ohio鈥攚hether you’re a health center, behavioral health agency, or managed care plan鈥攖his kind of planning can be a valuable input to strategy. Understanding the magnitude and timing of potential funding shifts helps organizations identify risk, advocate effectively, and prepare to adjust operations if needed.

While there are still many unknowns, one thing is clear: Medicaid policy is shifting, and proactive scenario planning is essential. HMA鈥檚 team stands ready to support organizations across Ohio and the country as they navigate what鈥檚 next.

To learn more about how we can help your organization model the impacts of H.R.1 and other federal changes, reach out to the HMA Ohio team today.

Blog

CMS Proposes New Ambulatory Specialty Model, Provides Details About Cell and Gene Therapy Model

Read Blog

Specialty model will focus on upstream management of lower back pain and congestive heart failure in traditional Medicare

This week, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released the Calendar Year (CY) 2026  (MPFS) proposed rule, which introduces a new mandatory  (ASM), and announced updates on the Cell and Gene Therapy Access Model. These developments reflect CMS鈥檚 continued focus on value-based care, chronic condition management, and new payment strategies.

Specialists will be financially accountable for the upstream management of low back pain and congestive heart failure in traditional Medicare. The model is designed to reduce costs and improve healthcare quality through performance-based payment adjustments and enhanced care coordination. The proposal is open for public comment, and CMS may revise model parameters before finalizing the rule later this year.

In this article, 杏吧视频 (HMA) experts break down the ASM model鈥檚 goals and design features and explains developments in CMS鈥檚 . HMA experts are reviewing the CY 2026 MPFS and the CY 2026  proposed rules and will highlight key policy provisions in a forthcoming article.

ASM Focus on Chronic Care

CMS estimates that more than two-thirds of traditional Medicare beneficiaries have at least one chronic condition. CMS states that spending on heart failure comes to $10鈥$13 billion annually, while annual costs associated with low back pain are $6鈥$8 billion. A lack of coordinated care can impede patients鈥 ability to manage their health and result in low-value care like unnecessary procedures and avoidable hospitalizations that run up costs without improving healthcare outcomes. The ASM will test how incentives such as payment adjustments to providers can encourage preventive care, earlier diagnosis, and better disease management.

Program Goals

The ASM is designed to encourage collaboration and communication between patients鈥 primary care providers and specialists who treat low back pain and heart failure. According to CMS, improved coordination will lead to the following:

  • Better patient outcomes and reduced disease progression
  • Decreased spending on low-value care experiences, such as unnecessary hospitalizations and procedures
  • Ensure providers are evaluated based on performance measures that are linked to the care they offer their patients
  • Optimize data transparency to allow providers to compare their performance with their peers when being measured on patient-centered outcomes

Performance will be assessed based on the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Value Pathways (MVPs) across four factors:

  1. Improving outcomes, such enhancing patients鈥 functional status or controlling their blood pressure
  2. Lowering costs, especially through reduced provision of unnecessary 杏吧视频
  3. Increasing patient engagement through clinical care processes
  4. Expanding interoperability and data communication through certified electronic health record technology

Though based on the MIPS MVPs, the ASM will enhance the focus of performance measures, thereby simplifying reporting and allowing for comparisons across different providers and regions.

Table 1. ASM Model Payments, Participants, and Timeline

CategoryDetails
Model TypeTwo-sided risk payment model
Payment Adjustment Range-9% to +9% based on performance relative to peers
Performance Tiers鈥 Positive adjustment for high performance
鈥 Neutral for average performance
鈥 Negative adjustment for low performance
Geographic ScopeRolled out in ~25% of core-based statistical areas (CBSAs) and metropolitan divisions nationwide
Specialties Included鈥 Low back episodes: Anesthesiologists, pain management, interventional pain management, neurosurgeons, orthopedic surgeons, physical medicine or rehabilitation specialists鈥 Heart failure episodes: General cardiologists
First Performance YearJanuary 1, 2027
Duration5 years
Relation to Other Models鈥 ASM is the second mandatory model proposed by CMS, following TEAM (Transforming Episode Accountability Model). While TEAM focuses on hospital-based episodes, ASM shifts accountability to specialists.鈥 Both models align with CMS鈥檚 broader strategy to reduce low-value care, a theme also reflected in the recently announced the Wasteful and Inappropriate Service Reduction (WISeR) model.
Policy ContextPart of CMS Innovation Center鈥檚 strategy to promote evidence-based prevention, high-value care, and reduce unnecessary utilization

Cell and Gene Therapy Model

On July 15, 2025, CMS  the participants in the Cell and Gene Therapy (CGT) Access Model. A total of 33 states, plus the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, will participate in this model, which has the federal government negotiating outcomes-based agreements with CGT manufacturers of sickle cell disease treatments. Participating states represent approximately 84 percent of Medicaid beneficiaries with the condition. Under the model, participating states receive guaranteed discounts and rebates from participating CGT manufacturers if the therapies fail to deliver their promised therapeutic benefits. States also have the option of receiving federal support of up to $9.55 million each to assist with implementation, outreach, and data tracking. States may choose when to begin their participation between January 2025 and January 2026. CMS indicated it may modify the model in the future to cover other diseases with high-cost, high-impact therapies.

Connect with Us

The ASM introduces opportunity and financial risk for specialists, hospitals, and health systems. Providers should consider strategies and tactics that will strengthen their collaboration with primary care teams to manage the chronic conditions addressed in the ASM model, which may require workflow redesign and new communication protocols. Providers also should consider whether they will need to make investments in data infrastructure and reporting to meet their performance quality goals.

贬惭础鈥檚&苍产蝉辫;Medicare team鈥攊ncluding actuaries, data analysts, and policy experts鈥攈elps organizations model, understand, and navigate the impact of proposed frameworks and policy changes, quantify risk, and more, so organizations can improve both financial performance and patient outcomes.

For details about these model announcements or the new proposed rules, contact the HMA Medicare team tracking these policies.

Blog

HHS Issues Immediate Policy Shift on Federal Benefit Eligibility Under PRWORA

Read Blog

On July 10, 2025, the US Department of Health and Human Services (), Department of Labor, Department of Justice, Department of Education, and US Department of Agriculture () issued notices that significantly reinterpret the definition of 鈥渇ederal public benefit鈥 used in Title IV of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA). These changes are effective immediately upon publication in the Federal Register, though agencies have opened 30-day public comment periods to solicit feedback.

In this article, 杏吧视频 (HMA) experts explain two of these notices鈥攖hose from and 鈥攂ased on what we know and outstanding issues that organizations should expect to arise in the coming months.

Programs Affected by HHS鈥檚 Revised Interpretation

The notice changes HHS鈥檚  of PRWORA and will have sweeping implications for service delivery across the country. It does this by reversing the classification of many long-standing programs to be 鈥淔ederal public benefits;鈥 until now, these programs had been specifically excluded from that definition. People with Unsatisfactory Immigration Status are not permitted to access these benefits. People classified as such include those who are undocumented, but also several categories of people lawfully in the United States, such as holders of H1B and J-1 visas, as well as some lawful permanent residents (green card holders 鈥 only for the purposes of eligibility for certain programs).

Programs newly subject to these restrictions include:

  • Head Start
  • Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics (CCBHCs)
  • Community Mental Health Services Block Grant
  • Community Services Block Grant (CSBG)
  • Health Center Program (Community Health Centers/FQHCs)
  • Health Workforce Programs (including grants, loans, scholarships, and loan repayments)
  • Services administered by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)
  • Title IV-E programs (Educational and Training Voucher Program, Kinship Guardianship Assistance Program and Prevention Services Program)
  • Title X Family Planning

Organizations that receive federal or pass-through federal funding may now be required to assess immigration status as a condition of service delivery鈥攕omething many have never done before. This shift raises significant operational, ethical, and mission-aligned challenges for hospitals, community health centers, behavioral health providers, and human 杏吧视频 organizations. PRWORA does include language exempting 501(c)(3) charitable organizations from being required to verify immigration status, but as the administration notes in its announcement, they are not barred from doing so. This will be an area to watch.

USDA Interpretation

The USDA鈥檚 notice similarly identifies all 16 programs the Food and Nutrition Services (FNS) administers as meeting the definition of 鈥淔ederal public benefit鈥 used in Title IV of PRWORA. These programs include:

  • Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
  • Nutrition Assistance Program for Territories
  • Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations (FDPIR)
  • Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)
  • National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, and Summer Food Service Program
  • Child and Adult Care Food Program

The notice, however, states that there is a difference between defining a program as a federal public benefit and applying other provisions of PRWORA to those programs. The USDA鈥檚 notice clarifies that providers of non-exempt benefits must verify that applicants have a qualified immigration status for purposes of PRWORA but does not address how verification should be implemented or how exceptions should be applied.

What We Know鈥攁nd Don鈥檛 Know

Though the list of affected programs is extensive, many critical implementation details remain uncertain. Both agencies acknowledge that further guidance will be needed to clarify how these changes will be operationalized.

Organizations should expect additional updates and further clarifications from federal agencies in the coming months. Legal challenges to these changes are almost certainly forthcoming.

Looking Ahead

These policy changes are both significant and still evolving. They will affect how and where 杏吧视频 are delivered, as well as whether people choose to access the 杏吧视频 at all.

During this period of uncertainty, frequent and transparent communication is essential. Deploy information and updates in multiple formats 鈥攚ritten, verbal, visual鈥攖o reach diverse audiences, including your organization鈥檚 staff and other stakeholders in your community. When policy is fluid and changing rapidly, authentic messaging about what is known and what remains unclear will position your organization as an honest broker and trusted partner.

HMA experts are tracking these and related developments. For questions and to discuss the impact of these policies on your organization, contact our featured experts聽below.

Blog

H.R. 1 Signed Into Law鈥擶hat It Means for Medicaid and Public Coverage

Read Blog

Just one week after we reviewed the Senate鈥檚 version of the budget reconciliation bill, H.R. 1, President Trump has now signed the legislation into law. The final iteration of H.R. 1 includes sweeping changes to Medicaid, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Marketplaces, and Medicare鈥攕everal of which diverge significantly from the version that the House passed May 22, 2025.

This update outlines many of the most consequential healthcare provisions, with a focus on Medicaid financing, eligibility, and operational impacts. It also highlights how stakeholders can act now to prepare for what happens next.

From Proposal to Policy: What Changed

The Senate鈥檚 amended version of H.R. 1, approved on July 1 and passed by the House on July 3, 2025, reshaped several key provisions in the earlier version of the House bill. Although the bill retains its core focus on tax policy and entitlement reforms, it further constrains state Medicaid financing and eligibility and scales back Marketplace subsidies for certain populations.

According to preliminary  from the Congressional Budget Office, the final bill will reduce federal healthcare spending by approximately $1.15 trillion over the next decade but also will increase the number of uninsured individuals by 11.8 million by 2034 because of changes to both Medicaid and Marketplace programs.

Medicaid Eligibility: A New Era of Policy and Operational Complexity

Mandatory Community Engagement Requirements

By December 31, 2026, states must implement community engagement (work) requirements for certain Medicaid enrollees. These requirements cannot be waived under Section 1115, though states may request 鈥済ood faith鈥 exemptions through 2028.

States must notify enrollees through multiple channels and develop the infrastructure needed to track compliance. Managed care organizations and other entities that have financial relationships with Medicaid 杏吧视频 are prohibited from determining compliance.

Tighter Eligibility and Redetermination Requirements

States must now conduct Medicaid eligibility redeterminations every six months for expansion populations. The bill also delays implementation of previously finalized rules that would have streamlined enrollment and imposes new verification requirements, including address checks. For immigrants, H.R. 1 narrows the definition of 鈥渜ualified鈥 individuals who are eligible for Medicaid and CHIP, removing coverage for refugees, asylees, and other humanitarian categories.

Cost Sharing for Expansion Adults

Starting in 2028, states must apply cost-sharing requirements to Medicaid expansion adults with incomes greater than 100 percent of the federal poverty level. Though primary care, mental health, and certain other 杏吧视频 are exempt, the policy introduces new administrative burdens for states and many providers.

Medicaid Financing: A Structural Shift

Provider Tax Restrictions

H.R. 1 freezes existing provider tax programs and bars any new taxes. Also, Medicaid expansion states must phase down the maximum allowable tax rate from 6 percent to 3.5 percent by 2032. This change will significantly constrain states鈥 ability to use provider taxes to finance Medicaid and draw down federal matching funds.

Limits on State-Directed Payments

The bill caps state-directed payments at either 100 percent or 110 percent of Medicare rates, depending on the state鈥檚 expansion status. Grandfathered payment arrangements will be phased down by 10 percent annually beginning in 2028. These provisions will require states to reassess supplemental payment strategies and may affect provider participation and access to care.

Other Key Provisions

The Rural Health Transformation Program provides $50 billion over five years to support financially distressed rural providers. H.R. 1 requires that each state submit a plan, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) administrator must approve or deny the plan by December 31, 2025, giving CMS and the US Department of Health and Human Services significant authority to shape the approval/denial processes, as well as critical details of the program and funding decisions.

For the Marketplace, the law eliminates ACA subsidy eligibility for certain lawfully present immigrants, ends conditional eligibility for ACA subsidies as well as passive re-enrollment, and eliminates the cap on ACA subsidy repayment at tax time. It also prohibits individuals who are not enrolled in Medicaid because of a failure to satisfy community engagement requirements from receiving any subsidies.

In addition, a new 1915(c) waiver option allows states to offer home and community-based 杏吧视频 (HCBS) without requiring that they provide institutional level of care but only if waiting lists for existing 杏吧视频 are not extended. Another provision excludes family planning and abortion service providers from receiving Medicaid funding if they received at least $800,000 in Medicaid reimbursements in 2023.

Finally, the law includes a one-year, 2.5 percent increase to the Medicare physician fee schedule conversion factor, which will be in effect for calendar year 2026 and expire thereafter.

What Stakeholders Should Do Now

States can begin planning for eligibility system changes, redetermination volume, and community engagement implementation, all of which require an understanding of the potential interactions of the federal Medicaid, Medicare, and ACA Marketplace policy changes. In addition, state officials should consider reassessing provider tax structures and supplemental payment strategies, where applicable. They need to engage early on rural health transformation funding opportunities and other provider supports.

Health plans can forecast enrollment and risk mix changes. They have opportunities to support states in compliance efforts to avoid federal funding recoupments. In addition, plans must prepare for new administrative requirements related to cost sharing and work requirements, among other policy changes on the horizon. Consumer communications should also be a focus area.

Providers and community-based organizations will need to prepare for greater uncompensated care needs and costs, which can lead to potential revenue loss, as well as new reporting and program integrity expectations. They also will play an integral role in assisting patients in maintaining coverage and navigating new requirements.

Vendors and health information exchanges have several opportunities to support the implementation of new requirements in H.R. 1 alongside the changing regulatory priorities. Examples include reviewing system capabilities to support new eligibility, verification, and reporting requirements and coordinating with states to ensure smooth implementation and program integrity.

Looking Ahead

The passage of H.R. 1 marks a turning point in federal health policy. Although the law鈥檚 fiscal goals are clear, its operational impacts will unfold over the coming months and years. States, plans, providers, and community organizations must now pivot from policy analysis to implementation readiness.

HMA will continue to monitor federal guidance, state responses, and stakeholder strategies. For more detailed analysis or support with scenario planning, contact聽our experts below.

Blog

Medicaid Spending in Federal FY 2024 Totals Nearly $909 Billion

Read Blog

This week, our In Focus section highlights findings from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) preliminary CMS-64 Medicaid expenditure report for federal fiscal year (FFY) 2024. According to the preliminary estimates, Medicaid expenditures on medical 杏吧视频 across all 50 states and six territories in FFY 2024 totaled $908.8 billion.

This figure provides important context and an initial baseline for tracking Medicaid spending trends following the enactment of H.R. 1, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. According to the Congressional Budget Office鈥檚 preliminary , H.R. 1 will reduce federal Medicaid and Children鈥檚 Health Insurance Program (CHIP) spending by approximately $1.02 trillion over the next decade (2025鈭2034)鈥攁 significant share of total Medicaid expenditures.

Total Medicaid Managed Care Spending

The following analysis is based on a 杏吧视频 Information Services (HMAIS) analysis of the draft CMS-64 report. This report contains preliminary estimates of Medicaid spending by state for FFY 2024. CMS  state expenditures through the automated Medicaid Budget and Expenditure System/State Children鈥檚 Health Insurance Budget and Expenditure System (MBES/CBES). The CMS-64 form identifies annual expenditures through these systems.

Key findings from HMAIS鈥 analysis, as also shown in Table 1, include:

  • Total Medicaid managed care spending (federal and state share combined) reached $517.5 billion in FFY 2024, up from $508.1 billion in FFY 2023.
  • This amount represents a 1.9 percent year-over-year increase from FFY 2023 to FFY 2024, a notable slowdown compared to the 8.5 percent growth observed in our聽analysis聽of year-over-year spending from FFY 2022 to FFY 2023.
  • Managed care accounted for 56.9 percent of total Medicaid spending in FFY 2024, down 2.6 percentage points from the previous year.
  • In terms of dollars, the increase in Medicaid managed care spending from FFY 2023 to FFY 2024 was $9.4 billion, compared with $39.8 billion from FFY 2022 to FFY 2023.

These figures include spending on comprehensive risk-based managed care organizations (MCOs), prepaid inpatient health plans (PIHPs), and prepaid ambulatory health plans (PAHPs). PIHPs and PAHPs refer to prepaid health plans that provide only certain 杏吧视频, such as dental or behavioral health care. Fee-based programs, such as primary care case management models, are not included in this total.

Table 1. Medicaid MCO Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Medicaid Expenditures, FFY 2020鈭2024 ($M)

Medicaid Managed Care Spending 杏吧视频

Medicaid managed care expenditures have grown consistently each year with total Medicaid expenditures. In FFY 2024, however, the growth in the share of managed care expenditures was notably lower than in the previous four years. The slower growth in managed care spending aligns with the post-COVID-19 policy unwinding period, during which many states completed eligibility redeterminations that had been paused during the public health emergency, driving historic enrollment increases (see Figure 1).

Figure 1. Total and MCO Medicaid Expenditures, FFY 2020鈭2024 ($M)

In addition, 杏吧视频 (HMA) has access to data in the Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System (T-MSIS) and has analyzed MCO spending in major categories of healthcare, including inpatient and outpatient hospital care, physician and other professional 杏吧视频, skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and home and community-based 杏吧视频 (HCBS), clinics, pharmaceuticals, and other 杏吧视频. Similarly, based on the CMS-64 data, in FFY 2024, the largest non-managed care spending categories included:

  • HCBS: $108.8 billion
  • Inpatient hospital 杏吧视频: $71.9 billion
  • Nursing facilities: $46.3 billion

HMA鈥檚 analysis of the T-MSIS database shows that while managed care remains the dominant delivery system model for Medicaid, spending in certain categories, such as SNFs and professional 杏吧视频, is growing faster. This shift may explain the declining share of managed care in overall Medicaid expenditures, even as absolute spending remains high. Further details can be found here and here.

Federal Versus State Spending

This year鈥檚 data reflect the phase-out of the temporary 6.2 percentage-point federal medical assistance percent increase under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act, which ended December 31, 2023. In FFY 2024, 64.7 percent of FFY 2024 spending came from federal sources (see Table 2).

Table 2. Federal versus State Share of Medicaid Expenditures, FFY 2020鈭2024 ($M)

What to Watch

Looking ahead, state Medicaid agencies will need to reassess financing strategies as total Medicaid federal funding declines because of H.R. 1 and other federal regulatory oversight and policy changes take effect. H.R. 1 includes provisions to gradually reduce allowable state provider tax rates from 6 percent to 3.5 percent by 2032, potentially requiring states to restructure financing or identify cost-saving measures.

CBO projections  that the Medicaid provisions in the bill will increase the number of uninsured individuals by an estimated 7.8 million by 2034.

Connect with Us

HMAIS, a subscription-based tool offered by HMA, provides detailed state by state analysis of the CMS-64 data and Medicaid managed care enrollment trends. For more information about the HMAIS subscription and access to the CMS-64 data, contact聽our experts below.

Blog

From State Discussions to National Policies: Healthcare in Focus

Read Blog

Since January 1, 2025,  (SOR), an HMA Company, has hosted eight conferences across states. SOR conferences give providers, health plans, lawmakers, and other stakeholders from all areas of healthcare the opportunity to have real-time discussions about pressing healthcare issues. These events provide a forum to bring together leaders with different perspectives and areas of expertise to discuss, digest, and synthesize issues and challenges at the state and local levels. These discussions allow states and their partners to improve healthcare delivery and prepare for changes before they happen.

This article explores common themes and issues addressed during the state-specific meetings.

Common Trends and State Priorities

Although each state has unique challenges and priorities, there is clear overlap in the issues being addressed. The exchange of ideas and best practices at these meetings is fostering a collaborative approach to tackling some of the most pressing challenges facing our nation today. Key themes include:

  • Improving healthcare accessibility and affordability.聽Many states are grappling with similar issues, such as the rising costs of medical 杏吧视频 and federal policy changes that will have varying implications for the healthcare sector, especially publicly financed health insurance programs. From new rules coming out of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to the 鈥淥ne, Big Beautiful Bill Act,鈥 which calls for reducing Medicaid funding and federal work requirements, healthcare industry leaders have been considering how these provisions will affect public healthcare programs. It was evident that these issues are at the forefront of state priorities, as leaders from different regions shared their strategies and experiences.
  • Assessing the evolving landscape for artificial intelligence (AI) and other technologies. Stakeholders discussed the state-specific landscape and opportunities for technologies such as AI, health data information, wearable health tools, and other digital health solutions. They explored opportunities to improve access to 杏吧视频 and achieve efficiencies, while seeking to understand the potential limitations of advancements in technology.
  • Addressing the opioid crisis.聽States are taking various approaches to combat the opioid epidemic, from increasing funding for addiction treatment programs to implementing stricter regulations on prescription medications. The urgency of this issue was palpable, with speakers and participants sharing personal stories and data to underscore the impact of the crisis on their communities. Many panel discussions also focused on approaches to improve behavioral health coverage parity, access to 988 杏吧视频, and care coordination.
  • Attracting and retaining all types of clinicians. Each state has designated health professional shortage areas and is thinking creatively about how recruit and keep healthcare practitioners. For example, many sessions at the SOR events explored where states are investing in educational programs to train the next generation of healthcare professionals. Loan repayment programs are also being expanded to incentivize clinicians to work in underserved areas. In addition, states are streamlining licensure processes to make it easier for healthcare providers to practice across state lines.

The conferences also provided a platform to discuss a range of other healthcare and health-related issues. Payment reform was a hot topic, with states exploring ways to make healthcare more affordable and efficient. Attendees were engaged in discussions about the impact of the federal Medicaid policy changes to coverage for health-related social needs (HRSNs), and the importance of community level strategies to address factors like housing, food security, and transportation. Maternal healthcare, the reentry population, the aging population, and rural health were other significant topics, each contextualized by the state-specific challenges and innovative solutions being explored.

What to Watch

The federal health policy landscape will continue to change over the coming months, which will greatly affect how states approach healthcare, especially Medicaid 杏吧视频. The policy changes and the downstream implications for state and local governments and their partners will be at the heart of discussions at the upcoming 杏吧视频 (HMA) National Conference, Adapting for Success in a Changing Healthcare Landscape, and State of Reform conferences. Key topics include:

  • The federal budget. On July 1, 2025, the Senate approved a tax and spending package that would cut over $1 trillion from healthcare, including $940 billion from Medicaid over 10 years. The bill introduces work requirements, provider tax limits, and stricter eligibility checks and is projected to increase the number of uninsured people by nearly 12 million, according to the Congressional Budget Office. The bill鈥檚 provisions will likely significantly disrupt the federal share of Medicaid funding so states will need to prepare and decide how to fund optional programs. Stakeholders will also want to prepare for the churn among their clients and expected drop in enrollment in publicly financed programs.
  • Medicaid work requirements. The federal work requirements in the House-passed and Senate-passed budget bills will require states to make policy and operational changes, including new systems and processes that meet the new federal mandates. State officials will have to tailor their work requirement programs to meet the capabilities and interests of the people who live in their respective states.
  • The impact of CMS actions. The Trump Administration鈥檚 new regulations and executive actions, particularly those announced by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), will affect states in various ways. The聽聽changing portfolio, for example, may provide states with new opportunities to participate in care delivery models. CMS鈥檚 decision to聽聽of new or existing requests for federal matching funds through Section 1115 demonstration waivers for designated state health programs and designated state investment programs may influence how states fund and deliver HRSN 杏吧视频.

Connect with Us

Join a range of healthcare stakeholders, including HMA experts, at one of the upcoming . These events provide a unique opportunity to delve into state and local-specific discussions, allowing for a deeper understanding of regional healthcare challenges and solutions.

We also invite you to continue these important conversations at the national level at HMA鈥檚 2025 conference, , which will take place October 14鈭16 in New Orleans, LA. This conference will focus on both state and federal issues, fostering collaboration and learning among state and federal agencies, payers, health systems, providers, and other key stakeholders.

For more information on the HMA conference, contact Andrea Maresca. For more information on State of Reform, contact SOR program director Katharine Weiss.

Blog

What the Senate’s Budget Approval Means for the Future

Read Blog

On July 1, 2025, the US Senate voted 51鈥50, to advance its version of , continuing the budget reconciliation process. Like the bill that the House passed in May, the Senate language calls for making significant changes to the Medicare, Medicaid, Affordable Care Act (ACA) Marketplace programs, as well as health savings accounts (HSAs) and publicly funded programs such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Relative to the House bill, however, the Senate differs substantially in approach and scope. Thus, the bill has been sent back to the House for consideration. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) intends to accelerate voting with the goal of clearing the legislation in the House by July 4, 2025.

Key Differences Between House and Senate Bills

Notable differences between the House and Senate packages pertain to the following:

  • Medicaid Provider Payments: The Senate version includes more restrictive changes to federal Medicaid provider taxes and state-directed payment policies. These changes are expected to affect hospitals that rely on Medicaid supplemental payments. The Senate bill also would create a $50 billion Rural Health Transformation Program to mitigate financial strain on healthcare providers in rural communities. The provision includes several stipulations regarding distributions, allocations, eligibility standards, and permissible uses of the funds, which will likely prompt considerable ongoing engagement from stakeholders if signed into law, particularly among hospitals and clinics that will face substantial headwinds under other components of the legislation.
  • ACA Marketplaces: Like the House bill, the Senate version includes provisions to recapture full ACA subsidy amounts, restrict subsidy eligibility for certain immigrant populations, and require verification of ACA subsidy eligibility. The Senate bill neither appropriates funding for cost sharing reduction subsidies nor includes provisions regarding the Marketplace Integrity and Affordability rule, which the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) finalized on June 20, 2025. In addition, the Senate bill offers several smaller flexibilities intended to increase usage of HSAs but does not include the full suite of HSA changes included in the House bill. The Senate language also does not call for expanding individual coverage health reimbursement arrangements (ICHRAs).
  • More Limited Medicare Package: Although the Senate language restores the ORPHAN Cures Act and adds a modest one-year payment increase under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS), the bill omits a number of significant Medicare policies included in the House version, including a much broader PFS investment tied to the Medicare Economic Index, as well as multiple pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) reforms under Medicare Part D. The Senate legislation also excludes two Medicaid PBM provisions that the House had included.

Estimates from the Congressional Budget Office

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has provided several  of the cost and coverage impacts of the healthcare and tax provisions in multiple versions of the reconciliation legislation. CBO has provided cost estimates for the , as well as the Senate  but has yet to release information on the final Senate version. Of note, CBO estimated the following:

  • The Medicaid, Medicare, and ACA related provisions in the Senate substitute amendment would reduce healthcare spending by approximately $1.15 trillion over the next 10 years.
  • The House bill would, by 2034, add 10.9 million people to the number of uninsured individuals in the United States.

What to Watch

Stakeholders should plan for the financial, policy, and operational impacts of the many provisions that could be enacted, including:

  • New administrative requirements for enrollment that will place additional obligations on individuals seeking coverage and which will require more state resources to implement and manage. Community engagement and work requirements are scheduled to take effect December 31, 2026.
  • Downward Medicaid financial pressures due to fewer federal funds, which will stress state budgets and states鈥 ability to maintain existing programs. This situation could lead some states to scale back eligibility for Medicaid, limitenrollment for optional programs, or some combination of these. Additionally, states could be expected to address increases in uncompensated care among their providers.
  • A pause on implementation of previously finalized regulations that streamlined the Medicaid enrollment process for individuals.

The combination of the House and Senate reconciliation bills and the recently finalized Marketplace Program Integrity and Affordability rule indicate an uncertain future for cost sharing subsides and enhanced premium tax credits in Marketplace programs. Healthcare stakeholders should prepare for the impact of the expiration of the enhanced premium tax credits would have on benefit packages, enrollee risk profiles, uncompensated care, and other key issues affecting access, cost, and outcomes.

Connect with Us

To learn more about the these policy changes and the impact on your organization,聽contact our featured experts below.

Blog

Forty Years Supporting Medicaid at HMA

Read Blog

This month鈥檚 Vital Viewpoints podcast features a special conversation with Jay Rosen, founder, president, and chairman of 杏吧视频 (HMA), as he reflects on the evolution of Medicaid and the 40th anniversary of HMA鈥檚 founding. From his early days shaping Michigan鈥檚 Medicaid program in Michigan’s Office of Health and Medical Affairs, to building a national firm dedicated to public sector healthcare, Jay鈥檚 story is one of purpose, persistence, and visionary leadership. Over four decades, Jay has guided HMA鈥檚 strategic vision, growth, client service, and innovation in publicly funded healthcare.

Jay began his career at a time when Medicaid was still finding its footing. In the 1970s and early 1980s, states were grappling with how to operationalize a new federal promise鈥攈ealthcare for low-income and aging Americans. Jay saw firsthand the complexity and urgency of that challenge. But he also saw opportunity: to build something better, smarter, and more accountable. That vision led to a fateful meeting at a Big Boy diner in East Lansing, Michigan, where Jay, Paul Allen (Michigan鈥檚 then Medicaid director), Elliot Wicks, and Jay Endsley laid the groundwork for what would become HMA on June 13, 1985, the date HMA was founded.

The 1980s saw extreme economic distress in the U.S., with healthcare costs rising by 1,520% annually. Pressure on the federal government to reduce financial support for public sector health programs meant state governments had to lead the way. Managed care emerged as a novel idea, using risk-bearing intermediaries between the state as a payer and providers/consumers. Michigan was an early adopter of managed care.

Over the next four decades, managed care programs evolved to bring more accountability in Medicaid, transforming the state鈥檚 role from administrator to regulator. The state agency could focus on using its levers to improve performance of public programs. Reporting requirements, data-driven decision making, quality measurement and other innovative tools were introduced.

鈥淥ne-third of the country is on Medicaid, covering 90 million people, including the most expensive, vulnerable populations. Medicaid operates well despite financial challenges, addressing significant societal obligations,鈥 says Rosen.

Now, as we celebrate the 60th anniversary of Medicaid in July, the program faces new operational and financial pressures, but also new tools — like AI and digital health technologies to meet the moment. Innovation in Medicaid isn鈥檛 optional, it鈥檚 essential. 聽HMA experts work with states and other organizations to harness these tools and stay current with these new initiatives.

Hear more from Jay in this month鈥檚 podcast episode, 鈥Medicaid At (Another) Crossroads: The Future of Public Healthcare Coverage鈥.  And as you look ahead to the future of Medicaid, trust HMA to be your partner for the next 40 years to come. #HMAknowsMedicaid

Ready to talk?