The Rural Health Transformation Program (RHTP) established in H.R. 1 represents one of the most significant federal investments in rural healthcare in decades. With $50 billion allocated between fiscal years 2026 and 2030, the program is designed to stabilize and transform rural health systems nationwide by supporting infrastructure, workforce development, and innovative care delivery models.
Administered by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the RHTP requires each state to submit a one-time application detailing a comprehensive rural health transformation plan. These plans must address eight core priorities, including improving access and outcomes, leveraging technology, fostering regional partnerships, and ensuring long-term financial solvency for rural entities. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has posted the , with application materials expected to become available in mid-September and state submissions due in late fall 2025.
The experts at ӰƵ, including our Information Services team (HMAIS), are tracking several state-level indicators and actions, including lead state agency points of contact, regulatory and public comment deadlines, and links to official notices. Following are the key takeaways from HMAIS State Action Tracker—a living resource for HMAIS subscribers, which will be updated with federal and state-level details such as state-selected RHTP categories and award amounts.
Initiative Alignment and Partner Engagement: Common Themes Across States
As of early September 2025, at least 15 states have begun structured intake to inform initiatives and uses of the RHTP funding—requests for information (RFIs), surveys, town halls, webinars—with others maintaining a planning posture pending release of CMS’s application template.
Common themes and approaches emerging from these activities include:
- Category-aligned input.States are encouraging stakeholders to align proposals with the statute’s eligible activities (e.g., access, outcomes, technology/prevention, partnerships, workforce, data/IT, solvency). Examples include:
- requires submissions to identify which of the nine categories are addressed and to discuss outcomes and sustainability.
- Delaware anduse structured prompts to sort feedback by activity type.
- Pre-guidance tools.States likeandare using RFIs and statewide surveys to gather ideas and identify viable projects before CMS guidance is finalized.
- Tech-enabled care.New and expanded uses of technology are topics of interest to states that are seeking ideas on how to maximize investments in remote monitoring, artificial intelligence (AI)/robotics, data/analytics, and IT/cybersecurity as eligible investments for improving access to ӰƵ, healthcare delivery, and workforce support. For example:
- explicitly references technology-enabled care models.
- andhighlight health IT/cybersecurity and value-based purchasing.
- Local coordination.States are encouraging regional partnerships/community hubs and rebalancing or right sizing service lines to match local demand.andemphasize right sizing service lines and coordinated care across the continuum of pre-hospital, emergency, acute inpatient, outpatient, and post-acute ӰƵ.solicitation prioritizes regionally coordinated partnerships and explicitly calls out right sizing the care continuum as a focus area.highlights strengthening partnerships between rural hospitals and other providers as a required component of the state plan.
- Sustainability and value-based readiness.States are asking how projects will be sustained after federal funding ends and how these can support and sustain alternative payment models.andrequest implementation details and financial durability plans.prompts discussion of how proposals enable care coordination and payment reform.
Looking Ahead
The emerging national landscape for RHTP initiatives is mixed. Early state movers and their engaged partners are building momentum and reducing execution risk, while others are preserving flexibility until additional federal guidance arrives. States waiting on CMS’s template may face challenges in coordinating stakeholders and finalizing priorities before the application deadline.
For providers and community-based organizations (CBOs), now is a critical time to engage. These organizations are uniquely positioned to shape state applications by sharing on-the-ground insights, identifying unmet needs, and proposing scalable, sustainable solutions. Participating in state RFIs, surveys, and town halls allow providers and CBOs to inform how funding is prioritized and deployed.
To prepare for the RHTP resources and support, healthcare organizations should:
- Monitor state-level engagement opportunities and respond to RFIs or surveys with clear, category-aligned proposals
- Build or strengthen partnerships with other local organizations to demonstrate regional coordination
- Assess internal capacity to implement and sustain projects beyond the federal funding window
- Document outcomes and financial models that support long-term viability and alignment with value-based care
Connect with Us
To support transparency during this fast-moving period, HMAIS has launched the RHTP State Action Tracker, a centralized resource for curating each state’s actions, agency leads, deadlines, and links to official notices. The tracker will be updated as CMS guidance is released and as states fill in details, such as selected categories and award amounts. For details about the RHTP, including the HMAIS State Action Tracker, contact HMA expertsbelow.